Enhancing Triage Systems in Emergency Units: An Extensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26463/rjns.14_2_13Keywords:
Triage system, Emergency room, Ethical dilemmas, Triage accuracy, AIIMS Triage SystemAbstract
Triage systems in emergency units play a crucial role in prioritizing patient care and optimizing resource allocation during mass casualty incidents or high-demand situations. This article provides a comprehensive review of triage systems, concentrating on their evolution, key components, challenges, and future directions. By synthesizing existing literature and incorporating insights from healthcare professionals, this research aims to inform policymakers and practitioners about the latest developments in triage systems and recommend strategies for enhancing their effectiveness. Triage systems in emergency units play a crucial role in prioritizing patient care and resource allocation. This abstract delivers an overview of triage systems, focusing on their structure, function, challenges, and potential enhancements. Drawing upon a comprehensive review of literature, including academic studies, healthcare guidelines, and expert opinions, this research elucidates the multifaceted nature of triage systems and their impact on emergency care delivery. In contemporary emergency units, triage systems operate on standardized protocols and algorithms aimed at rapidly assessing patients upon their arrival and assigning them to priority categories based on the severity of their condition. However, these systems face challenges such as overcrowding, resource constraints, and variability in patient presentations, which can impact their effectiveness and efficiency. To address these challenges, opportunities for enhancing triage systems abound. Technological advancements, such as the integration of Electronic health records (EHRs) and real-time data analytics, offer promising avenues for improvement. Furthermore, ongoing training and education programs for triage personnel can enhance their skills and decision-making abilities, leading to more consistent and accurate triage assessments. Ultimately, by embracing innovation and collaboration, emergency units can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their triage systems, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
References
1. Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Ehrenberg A, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2011;19:42.
2. Baumann MR, Strout TD. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the emergency severity index. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49(2):234-40.
3. Cone DC, MacMillan DS. Mass triage and the evaluation of patient outcomes in emergency department disasters. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12 (4):297-8.
4. Lerner EB, Schwartz RB, Coule PL, et al. Use of triage sieves to minimize triage errors. Prehospital Emergency Care 2001;5(1):24-7.
5. Gilboy N, Tanabe T, Travers D, et al. Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A triage tool for emergency department care, version 4. Implementation Hand book 2012 Edition. AHRQ Publication No. 12- 0014: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
6. Graff LG, Stevens C. Triage in Medicine, Part I: Concept, History, and Types. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26(3):299-303
7. Garg R, Somvanshi M, Singh V, et al. Assessment of emergency department triage practices in India using an international web-based survey. J Emerg Med 2019;56(2):178-85.
8. Joshi A, Rajhans P, Kulkarni M, et al. Triage in Indian emergency department: A review of the protocol followed at a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Emerg Pediatr 2019;1(1):31-7.
9. Mathai A, Phillips B, Raghuram A, et al. The effectiveness of the South African Triage Score (SATS) in a rural emergency department. S Afr Med J. 2019;109(5):332-6.
10. Wuerz RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, et al. Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(3):236-42.
11. Obermeyer Z, Abujaber S, Makar M, et al. Emergency care in 59 low - and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2015;93(8):577-586G.
12. Ranney ML, Choo EK, Wang Y, et al. Emergency department patients' preferences for technology based behavioral interventions. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60(2):218-27.
13. Gravel J, Gouin S, Goldman RD, et al. The Canadian triage and acuity scale for children: A prospective multicenter evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60(1):71-7.
14. Worster A, Bledsoe RD, Cleve P, et al. Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45(4):448-51.
15. Sahu A, Bhoi S, Galwankar S, et al. All India Institute of Medical Sciences Triage Protocol (ATP): ATP of a Busy Emergency Department. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020;13(2):107.
16. Bullard MJ, Unger B, Spence J, et al. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. CJEM 2008;10:136-51.
17. Chen SS, Chen JC, Ng CJ, et al. (2010). Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments. Emerg Med J 2010;27(6):451-455
